Navigating the Playing Field on Immigration

Navigating the Playing Field on Immigration
Sen. John McCain's trip to Latin America this week--his third foreign trip since clinching the Republican nomination--has brought immigration back to the forefront of the presidential campaign.

As McCain hits Mexico City today and both candidates step up their efforts to reach out to Hispanic voters, a number of surveys shed light on Americans' views on the contentious topic. Overall, immigration is broadly considered one of the top issues in the campaign, but neither presidential candidate holds a clear advantage on it, as most surveys place McCain and his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama within striking distance of each other on managing immigration. This tight margin reflects the deep division in opinions on immigration by ideology and along several demographic lines.

In a June 2008 CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 8 percent chose illegal immigration as the most important issue in their presidential vote decision. CNN has asked this question five times in 2008: each time about one in 10 respondents rated illegal immigration their top issue, putting it on par with terrorism, and in the most recent poll, just about even with health care.

About three in 10 Americans consider illegal immigration "extremely important" in their vote for president. According to a June 2008 Gallup/USA Today poll, 27 percent of Americans said the candidates' positions on illegal immigration will be "extremely important" to their vote, placing it below the economy (49 percent "extremely important), the situation in Iraq (44 percent) and terrorism (41 percent), but according to a recent CNN poll, the issue remains more salient than abortion, gun policy and foreign trade.

Ideology sharply divides opinions on the importance of the issue. According to the Gallup/USA Today poll, 36 percent of conservatives said illegal immigration will be "extremely important" to their vote, less than half as many liberals agree.

But ideology isn't the only dividing line. About three in 10 Americans over age 35 said illegal immigration is "extremely important" in their vote, but just two in 10 under age 35 said the same. Education matters as well: about a third of Americans with a high school degree or less view illegal immigration as "extremely important," compared with 20 percent of college graduates.

Recent polls suggest neither candidate has a lock on the issue. In a Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted in mid-May, Obama held a five-point edge over McCain as the candidate Americans trust more to handle immigration issues, but the Gallup/USA Today poll found the two about even, 36 percent said McCain would do a better job, 34 percent Obama.

The electorate is split deeply along partisan lines, with 68 percent of Democrats supporting Obama on the issue and 74 percent of Republicans favoring McCain in the Post-ABC News survey. Independents supported Obama by a margin of 12 points.

Personal economic situation plays a large role in determining whom Americans support on this issue. Those with household incomes of $50,000 or more per year supported McCain over Obama by an eight-point margin while those with less income favored Obama by 18 points. Moreover, Americans who reported having difficulty paying their bills supported Obama by 23 points and those worried about their standard of living supported the Illinois Democrat by 11 points.

One pitfall on this issue that could prove troublesome for both candidates, 19 percent in the Gallup survey, including a quarter of independents, said they trust neither candidate to handle immigration. One safe bet on this issue, both will be aiming to fill that void.


By Jennifer Agiesta | July 3, 2008; 2:07 PM ET Post Polls
Previous: McCain Courts Public Opinion | Next: The Flip-flopping Flap

CommentsPlease email us to report offensive comments.

I would hope that Mc Cain is ultimately courting Hispanic voters. Being involved with the Columbian hostages is not a bad thing. Making friends with Latin American countries isn't a bad thing either. What he has an abysmal record in is the treatment of Hispanics in Arizona. The state has even defied court orders to provide adequate ESOL education for students learning English. He needs to ask his state to treat these voters better and provide them full access to education.

Posted by: Lynn E | July 3, 2008 3:07 PM

He has been pro immigrant so you can't complain about that. Just look at the fact that he was the only Senator proposing and backing a bill to eventually grant them citizenship at a time when everyone else in Congress, including hispanic members, were saying deport every immigrant.
As for the state of Arizona, you have to note that the governor is a Democrat who opposed McCain's pro immigrant bill. The state's don't always do what the federal government wants them unless forced. To do that, McCain has to go through 434 other members of Congress who are hostile to immigration.

Posted by: Robert C | July 3, 2008 3:31 PM

Afraid there is not much evident difference, between Presidential Wannabes regarding the economic pestilence, that confronts AMERICA? Course eventually if/when illegals start deporting themselves, we can give more visa's to Engineers, scientists and Ph.d.

Senator Obama already promised he would give the millions of illegal aliens, squatting in this nation AMNESTY? Old McCain will do likewise to get the vote in November. Both parties are heavily pandering to foreign nationals, no matter what the catastrophic TRILLION DOLLAR economic impact to taxpayers. We must pass the SAVE ACT before this happens. Afterwards will BE TOO LATE for overburdened taxpayers, who will be forced to support them. Plus the millions more who will think it's 'open day' from the third world countries poor.

Under the federal SAVE ACT (H.R.4088) predatory employers would be arrested, fined and possibly imprisoned and millions of illegal aliens would leave of their OWN ACCORD. It would give (ICE) more funding and build the US border patrol up to 20.000 more agents in strength, build the fence as ORIGINALLY intended. This nationwide law would also begin to remove criminal aliens, 'SANCTUARY STATES' from our society. It would give extra teeth to all immigration laws now on the books. Demand the SAVE ACT! (2022243121 ) Unsuppressed details at NUMBERSUSA.

Posted by: Brittanicus | July 3, 2008 4:00 PM

The quarter who don't trust either candidate and folks like myself -- people who think both candidates are way to wishy-washy.

I haven't heard either candidate admit that this wave of illegal immigration has done damage to our schools, legal system, hospitals or anything else.

Both candidates seem more eager to sympathize with illegal immigrants

Views: 39

Comment by Dr. Jesse J. Hargrove on September 16, 2009 at 9:23pm
Senorita Wilson has been reading and researching on many cultures and Cristobal.--JH
Comment by Markeitha Davis on June 24, 2010 at 5:41pm
My feelings towards the article went both ways. I felt like justice should be served from both sides. The mother should be punished for her actions considering this was her second offense. The officer should be held responsible for his actions. I strongle agree to Mr. Ozments statement her actions should not have affected how she was treated in her late pregnancy conditions.


You need to be a member of African American Scholars of the Spanish Language and Culture to add comments!

Join African American Scholars of the Spanish Language and Culture

© 2022   Created by Dr. Jesse J. Hargrove.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service